For a Theory of
the Sociocultural Evolution of Human Knowledge*
In the
parable of the tower of Babel an unattainable inclement God rejects mankind’s
aspiration to the heights of knowledge and mindful worship. Antiquity and the Old
Testament refuses man’s power of reasoning the truth, the supreme challenge in
divine form. But the tower man plans to build to the glory of his God is a
tribute, a majestic gesture, an offer of man’s wits and prowess, of man’s
devotion and sacrifice to his God.
God as the supreme Goodness, supreme Beauty, supreme Truth does not escape
man’s capacity of knowledge, is not impenetrable but rather believed to be so,
offended by man’s enterprise. In reality the message is quite clear as it comes
from a sacerdotal caste that prefers keeping man under the spell of a revealed
God and truth rather than a rational one.
Antiquity has passed with its marvels in stone, marble, clay or plaster,
medieval times raised a monument to God in exemplary conduct and life of sages,
saints, martyrs, and ordinary pious people, but there was the modern era which
brought the mind’s triumph over man’s limitations of previous millennia.
What does Brancusi’s Endless Column represent but the expression of mankind’s
unlimited spirit, the quest for the knowledge of the supreme Goodness, Beauty,
Truth, a perpetual quest as long as this supreme is in fact infinite. Human
spirit is now free to reach infinite heights of Beauty, Goodness, Truth.
The traditional Platonic triad of ideas, concepts, values of Beauty, Goodness,
Truth form the core of an axiological unity which is in focus here.
The hypothesis of this theory is that the essence of the human quest in
achieving social harmony manifested by embracing these
basic values across the millennia. The value-triad appears at a certain
historical moment as a unity and at the same time only one component is
exalted. The value-triad Beauty, Goodness, Truth as applied to sociocultural
evolution is approached here in terms of time and space, as far as data and
facts of civilization(s) and culture(s) allow, synchronically and
diachronically, at the level of phylogenesis.
In depth examination of the sociocultural evolution from 3000 BCE to 2000 CE
leads to the identification of three types of educational models: ESTHETIC,
ETHIC, SCIENTIFIC which correspond to ANCIENT societies, 3000BCE - 500CE,
MEDIEVAL societies, 500 CE – 1500 CE, and MODERN societies, 1500 CE – 2000 CE,
respectively.
Regarding the periodization of history, I consider the leading values, BEAUTY,
GOODNESS, TRUTH giving the character of an era. Thus the Ancient world will
develop its Esthetic model from 3000 BCE to 500 CE as the next cultural model
the Ethical one represented in Asia by Buddhism and in North Africa, Europe,
and the Middle East by Christianity is almost established by the 5th c CE .
The Modern world begins in the West around 1500 CE with the spread of Humanism
and Universities, a shift from the Ethical model to the Scientific model of
education.[1 ]
In figure 1 it is shown the world line of sociocultural evolution which
parallels that of the orbit of Earth depicted in two spatial dimensions X and Y
and a time dimension. This world line is a helix in spacetime. So is the world
line of sociocultural evolution.
Fig. 1
The world
line of human knowledge shown here developed predominantly one central value,
moved from one ethos to another in historical periods of time.
The evolution of humankind never occurred at the planetary level but in
geographical pockets. The aesthetic, ethic, scientific as forma mentis can be
found outside their respective historical periods of time, outside their age,
Antiquity, Middle Ages, the Modern age.
For instance the golden era of Hindu temple architecture and art is comprised
between 600 and 1600 AD, that is the Ethical age of mankind, the Middle Ages
and beyond.
In the same sense the modern era that brings along the scientific value, the
scientific truth, will also be of unprecedented growth and expansion of the
major world religions, ethical systems. In the Scientific age the Ethical model
of Christianity spreads to the Americas, Australia, Africa. Thanks to European
cuattrocento’s printed press and later missionary work the Bible becomes the
most traveled book on Earth.
From the Gutenberg Bibles to the scientific revolution will pass only two
centuries. It was the scientific revolution and the astronomical revolution
namely which anticipated the paradigm shift of the third millennium. [2]
But the sociocultural evolution never took place in an uniform manner. In the
age of quantum physics there are regions in the world with an ethically focused
society (ex.Iran, Pakistan), driven at the state level by a medieval ethos as
well as religious states based on a world view produced in Antiquity, (ex. the
Hinduist state of Nepal).
In the Early modern era the Renaissance has placed man in the center of the
Universe and so did communism. Even when God is replaced with man the pyramid
remains as a symbolic structure of human aspirations.
Traditionally the paradigm of human knowledge, human spirit was represented in
the pyramid, the tower of Babel, a structure that dominated for almost 3000
years the Western Judeo-Christian philosophical thought.
Whether the tip of the pyramid is a God, a pharaoh, the Pope, the Fuhrer,
Chairman Mao, Bill Gates or Robert Murdoch the structure is a finite one, a
closed one.
The third millennium changes this perspective, the paradigm shifts from the
pyramid, from the tower of Babel to Brancusi’s Endless Column, that is from the
finite structure to the infinite form, from the closed society to the open
society.
The tower of Babel has been traditionally associated with man’s arrogance to
reach God. When in fact this is the sense of man’s quest since he started
walking in vertical position, reaching the heights of wisdom and knowledge. By
looking at the stars, the moon and the sun, man becomes a vertical human being.
The Endless Column is visual art form, the quintessence of Pico della
Mirandola’s De hominis dignitate, Shakespeare’s The Tempest, Cervantes’ Don
Quijote, Goethe’s Dr. Faust, the triumph of human spirit, the infinite
resources of human genius, the search for the idea, the perfect model, which is
not static, temporal, not an optimal model but rather an ever bettering human
model, self-perfecting and perfecting the ways of knowledge and understanding
of the universe at the macrocosmos and microcosmos levels.
The third millennium is the age of pluralism. Enough of one God, one man, one
church, one nation, one race domination. Agents of change helped create a
paradigm shift moving aesthetics, ethics and scientific knowledge to pluralism,
inclusion, tolerance, multidisciplinary approach, open answers.
Speaking of civilization and culture is not possible
without a definition of our terms.
Civilization is the knowledge of creating the material conditions necessary to
living in human societies(Sumer, Egypt, Indus Valley, Maya).
Culture is transmitted knowledge in oral or written form, i.e. language and script
(the Vedas).
Civilization is the step from natura naturans to natura
naturata, from adapting to a natural environment to the modification
of it through building not just of dwellings but rather public structures(shrines,
temples, city buildings). A civilization is a culture in the human action. A
civilization can be destroyed without destroying or losing its culture. Gordon
Childe [3] mentiond the preservation of the cultural capital of the Egyptian calendar
as well as the Sumerian division of the day and the hour still in use today. I
would add the example of Minoan civilization that ceased after 1400 BCE. The
palatial centers of Knossos and Phaistos got into oblivion and ruin, but the
Minoan culture was continued by the Mycaeneans, and the 19th c. and 20th c.
excavations revealed the material evidence of the Minoan culture on Crete, the
earliest known in Europe.
Civilizations can be living cultures, the Jewish culture, lost cultures,
Atlantis, Phoenicia or rediscovered cultures through archeological excavation
and research, Greco-Roman antiquity, Etruria, etc.
China and India are the oldest civilizations and cultures in existence without
interruption in the same geographical space since ancient times, ca 3000 BCE to
the present day. While the Chinese language and script are still in use today,
Sanskrit, the oldest of Indian languages is a dead language, yet it is used in
Hindu ceremonies nowadays.
So we can speak of Indian or Chinese civilization and culture in general; but
we can also speak of an ancient, medieval or modern Chinese or Indian culture
or civilization. In this sense I would call ancient, medieval and modern as
types of a sociocultural model of civilization. All cultures/civilizations
belonging to a certain type share common features.
Culture is thus transmitted knowledge in its threefold dimension: ART, ETHICS,
SCIENCE.
I consider here ART, ETHICS, SCIENCE as social forms of knowledge and BEAUTY,
GOODNESS, TRUTH their respective values. These are the primary cultural values
that can be found in any given civilized society.
Although the triad of values can be found in all types of cultural models of
civilization only one of these gives the social ethos of a societal model, i.e.
BEAUTY in the ancient times, GOODNESS in the medieval times, TRUTH in the
modern times, respectively.
Who
dictates a social ethos?
Societies are not given, pre-determined, they are established in the human
action, developed or destroyed by human action, erased from the face of the
earth or submerged by physical phenomena. Human action aims at a societal
model. It can be argued that this societal model is at least in theory an
optimal model. Human action aiming at a societal model becomes planned action.
The social ethos is in this planning the driving force to carry out a model.
Societies are thus structures in the process of accomplishing a model, namely a
functioning dynamic model.
The social ethos is realized in the process of teaching-learning displayed in
the human action carrying out a model. A sociocultural model is an educational
model.
The Christian moral ethos of the Roman Empire is announced three centuries
prior to the edict of Milan 313 throughout the empire by the life and
activities of martyrs of different ethnic groups and the life and activities in
the catacombs or in the underground cities of Cappadocia. The shift in social
ethos follows a pattern of spiritual evolution, marks a transition from the
pagan Antiquity in which the central value is Beauty to the medieval forma
mentis in which the central value is Goodness. Before being the official
religion of the Roman Empire Christianity is embraced spontaneously by the
masses. Christianism as a new social ethos is not imposed at the political
level but rather adopted as a state religion( Armenia, the Roman Empire) due to
its popularity and widespread character.
Buddhism, Christianity, Islamism were in the first place a new moral ethos and
only secondly they became religious, economic [4], social, political ethos.
Sacralization,
religious values, the esthetic ethos, the ethic ethos
Sacralization is a mental process of veneration, adoration,
worship.Sacralization is a relation established between a human being, a group
of human beings and the object or being(later the abstract notion) of
veneration.
In its earliest primitive stage sacralization appears merely as an emotional or
kingship rapport (totemism, animism, pantheism).
In sacralizing humans attribute holiness to real or fantastic objects, beings,
mental constructs, nature, the Universe. Sacralization is thus an accepted role
of human subordination to a power at the cognitive level.
From a philogenetic perspective the first form of cognition is magic. From
magic emerged art, religion, science(curative medicine being probably the
earliest empirical form of scientific knowledge).
At a later stage of sociocultural evolution sacralization is incorporated to
religions, spiritual practices, systems of beliefs which deny humans the
cognitive capacity and rather rely on occult processes of illumination,
revelation, divination, trance, prophecy aiming at obtaining the ultimate
truth.
If magic is syncretic knowledge so is religion or philosophy, spiritual
practices of oral or written tradition. On another stage of human evolution
sacralization applies to concepts not related to religion or spirituality
(homeland, flag, anthem, etc) or abstract notions as Freedom, Justice,
Happiness, etc.
Religion whether is Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity, Islamism, Taoism, Lamaist
Buddhism, etc. consists of a cosmology(science of the universe) or a
cosmogony(a creation myth), an ontology(theory of the Being), a
gnoseology(theory of knowledge) and an ethical code of behavior for its
adherents. If one strips away religions of their cosmogonies, ontologies,
gnoseologies and system of moral values than what we remain with is a story
which can be regarded as art, as literature. To this piece of art, of
literature we attribute a sacred character and we have already created a
religion. Religions are axiomatic. Religions offer a vision of a finite,
dogmatic truth. Religions reveal or conceal the ultimate truth, they are the
truth itself or the placeholder for an impenetrable, unattainable truth.
In this sense I would say that religious values are syncretic values with a
sacred function.The predominant character of religions is a moral model. Thus
religious values can be assimilated to ethical values.Philosophy is speculative
thinking with a scientific function.Philosophical values are also syncretic
values, ethic, esthetic, scientific. These border values, religious and
philosophical, are values that do not have a specific determinant. Religion can
be ethical, philosophical in content. To this ethical, philosophical content it
is attributed a sacred character.If the esthetic value is built upon the
concepts of Beauty/ Ugliness, the ethic values is determined by
Goodness/Evilness, the scientific value builds upon True/False, where is the
place of religion and philosophy then? In a space between the ethical, the
esthetic, the scientific which make Goodness, Beauty, Truth the three values
that matter in any system of values.
In ancient societies the ethical, the philosophical, the religious, the
scientific values are transmitted through ART. Monumental art is born in
antiquity in all known cultures and civilizations, whether that masterpiece is
architectural, pictorial, sculptural or literary.The function of ancient art is
primarily educational. Educate through BEAUTY. Ancient art introduces order into
life, a cosmic and social order .
The three monumental literary works of Antiquity are the Chinese I Ching ca
2852-200 BCE, the Hebrew Scriptures ca 1000-500 BCE (the Wellhausen School) and
the Hindu Vedas ca 1500-500 BCE. These are national cultural models, a
Weltanschauung created in the Esthetic age of mankind and indeed they are
literary monuments even if their values are syncretic, philosophical,
scientific, ethic, religious, esthetic.
I Ching, the Hebrew Bible, the Vedas are of the same stature as the
Mesopotamian ziggurats, the Egyptian pyramids, the Minoan Palaces, the
Greco-Roman temples, the Aztec or Inca pyramids. They are monuments of the
cultures they represent, Chinese, Jewish, Indian respectively.
In Antiquity, China, Israel, India expressed its forma mentis in written form.
Their cultural models in the Esthetic age are not built in stone but rather in
words.
*
* *
If we do not know a certain name or a certain date for the creation of the
Sumerian or Egyptian religion we can speak with approximation of the creator
and creation of Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Taoism, Confucianism, Buddhism,
Christianity, Manicheism, Islamism.
The ethic educational model is announced by the major world religions, in
reality great ethical systems of Buddhism, Christianity, Islamism which are
carried out in medieval times through the central value of Goodness. Earlier
and more rapid than Christianity the spread of sects and schools of Buddhism
starts in the 2 century BCE. In the 4th c. CE Buddhism is already present in
most of India (3rd c. BCE), Sri Lanka (1st c. BCE), Thailand and Burma(1st c.
CE),China, Vietnam (2nd c. CE), Korea, Nepal (4th c. CE), while Christianity
becomes state religion first in Armenia(301 CE) next in the Roman Empire (edict
of Milan 313 CE) and is the predominant Ethical model in most of the Hellenized
world before the rise of Islam in the 7th c. CE.
In the Middle Ages religions are the vehicle of a new social ethos, the moral
ethos. The educational function of the new religions is a response to an
ethnically diverse world or a consequence of the dysfunction of political,
economic, social empires and kingdoms of Antiquity. Political instability
create the necessity of a different educational approach: teaching and learning
by example, by a moral model, by achieving moral virtues, by doing good deeds,
by following normative teachings of exemplary masters, Buddha, Jesus, Mohamed.
The new religions do not conflict with the preexistent religions or systems of
beliefs in the sense that they do not consider themselves exclusive, ex.
Christianity adds to the Old Testament the New Testament, Zoroastrianism is a
reformation of Indo-Iranian religions (Mazdeism), Buddhism is adapted in China
and Tibet to meet local needs and indigenous beliefs and practices, Islamism
incorporates most of the wealth of oral tradition of bedouin Arabs and that of
local cultures of Mesopotamia, Asia Minor, African berbers, India. The Middle
Ages changes the character of the moral norm from ethnic to multiethnic, it is
the leap from a national religion, Judaism to an international religion,
Christianity, from a local value of Goodness to a universal value, from a local
church to a universal church (One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church).
Meanwhile a national religion like Judaism undergoes a reverse process: from
temple to synagogue. The synagogue becomes a religious embassy of an ethnic
group established abroad, outside its country, geographical space. From 500 CE
to 1500 CE and beyond the three moral models enterprise a monumental work of
dogmatic consolidation, creation of shrines and schools, and proselytizing and
converting populations from three continents, Asia, Africa, Europe, in the name
of the supreme Goodness through faith.
Middle Ages is the theater of religious wars not for the triumph and supremacy
of a faith or moral teaching but for the economical survival of impoverished
societies of new peoples arriving at the end of Antiquity at the gates of Rome
or Jerusalem. The West was Christianized in order to be civilized, in the same
way the nomad bedouins of Arabia were Islamized. Educate in the faith for a
better control of unruly, destitute populations was the social mandate of the
medieval era. Buddhism and Christianity appear as spontaneous responses of
societies to the crisis of Antiquity, India, the Roman Empire. The new
religions are not made at order but they emerge as a need of spiritual healing
and hope and solidarity of large diverse masses afflicted by misery and
exploitation. From shield of the miser in Antiquity they become a weapon of the
state, the ruler, the politician, India’s King Asoka (3rd c BCE) adopts
Buddhism as a state religion, sending missionaries to Kashmir, Persia and
Ceylon and Central Asia along the Silk Road. In the West the edict of Milan 313
CE modified the status of Christianity from a cultic practice to that of a
state religion, an institutionalized moral norm throughout the Roman Empire.
Buddhism, Christianity, Islamism do not clash in the Middle Ages at the
individual level, local level in its moral function but in what they have as
ideology of a certain political power, within a political system, ex: in China
the coexistence of Taoism, Buddhism and Confucianism was possible from the Han
dynasty (3rd c. BCE) to Emperor Tang Wu Zong (9th c CE) known for his
persecutions; in his time Buddhism was forbidden in China for social and
economic reasons. Over 4600 temples were destroyed and 260,500 monks and nuns
were forced to give up their religion. The clash between Islam and Christianity
did not arise in the realm of moral values but in what economic and political
reasons were concerned, competition for the spheres of influence. Muslim Spain
could accommodate the three religions Islam, Christianity, Judaism as long as
Christians and Jews paid taxes. While Christian Europe clashed with Islam
mainly because the ecclesiastical class of the Catholic West felt the threat of
being taxed or reduced in numbers and authority. An economically stagnant
Medieval Christian West financially weakened by the Crusades of 11th-13th
centuries, a split church (the great Schism of 1054), plagued by heresy
(Cathars, Waldesians, Brethren of the Free Spirit) will respond with the
creation of the Inquisition and the universities for the education of
professional clergy. Encouraging dogmatic study in Medieval Europe aimed at
reinvigorating a fading faith in the system, the Christian model, by
consolidating its institutions while pursuing the more pragmatic goal of
fighting its way through the Islamic block to the source of Oriental
commodities, the spices, the silk, the tea, the paper of India and China. In
its turn Buddhism as a moral medieval model that spread in the Indian peninsula
and along the Silk Road as early as the 3rd c. BCE was displaced by Islam in
1200 CE. The confrontation between the two religions as societal models does
not take place at the moral level of values and dogma but at the level of power
and regional domination.
The Mongol Empire of Central Asia, for instance, oscillated from religious
tolerance in times of Genghis Khan and Kublai Khan to periods of Buddhism in
time of Hulegu Khan and his son Abaqa Khan to periods of Islamic faith and
fervor in time of Timur Lenk. Islam imposed itself not by the superiority of
its doctrine but by force. Holy war is an integral part of Islam, non violence
is a central Buddhist value.
In the 15th c. Europe is already mature for the new societal model. The
sociocultural ethos will be science, the new value, Truth. A new theory of
knowledge acquires prestige among scholars, the theory of the double truth
(Averroism, Siger de Brabant).
How
do values change ?
A sociocultural model is stable or dynamic depending on the form used to
express a Weltanschauung, a world view. The most stable forms are the esthetic
and ethic invested with a sacred function.The esthetic and ethic can be forms
of the social or individual consciousness or simply values.The esthetic and
ethic forms of consciousness can have syncretic values,esthetic and ethic
value, esthetic and ethic function but also a sacred function.
By form I understand here structure.The stable structure is the momentary or
final equilibrium(the zenith) of a prior development either mental, theoric or
social, practic.The intellectual, the social structures are structures in
evolution. The structure has a function.When a structure is replaced by another
structure the function can stay the same. (ex. Ancient art has a sacred
function so does the ethical form in the Middle Ages.) Stable structures have
norms or rules which do not act independently.There are structures having
values plus norms with a sacred function ( at the ideological level).
Speaking of Beauty, Goodness and Truth as values it should be pointed out that
they are to be treated here as dual, positive and negative value or being
eufunctional or dysfunctional. For example, from the 6th to the 1th c. BCE the
syncretic value system of Antiquity as a world view governed by the Esthetic
value becomes dysfunctional in Persia, India, China, Israel, Greece.The archaic
cultural model of Antiquity is challenged through the rise of religious
reformers, philosophers and sages, Zoroaster , Buddha, Lao Tze, Confucius,
Jesus, Socrates. Likewise the Ethic value system of Christianity is
eufunctional between the 4th c CE and the 10th c CE and dysfunctional after the
11th c CE in Europe.
*
* *
The new ethos does not appear all of a sudden from the old ethos neither it is
independent of it. The old values do not clash with the new values but the
previous value by its own development and completion declines, turns into
nonvalue. The eclipse of a value is its negative, the nonvalue. This is the
moment of crisis of the value system in which the new value does not opposes
the old value (initial, prior value) but the nonvalue, the nadir of the
previous value, it tries to overthrow it, to undermine the stability of the old
value.The negative tends to cancel the positive.The opposition is between the
zenith and the nadir of a value. The new value cannot deny an old value the
same as it cannot appear out of nothing but it contests its central place
within the system of values in a moment in which the old value is exhausted in
its forms and its function does not respond to Necessity at the ideological
level. Therefore the new value does not eliminate the previous value from the
value system but pushes it to a secondary plan, it changes its content. The
dialectics of sociocultural values engaged in a social ethos follows the
direction thesis, antithesis, synthesis. In the Esthetic age of Antiquity the
dialectics of the esthetic form follows the direction thesis- classical Greek
art and age of Pericles (5th Century-4th Century BCE), to antithesis in
Hellenism (323 to 31 BCE) to synthesis - Ghandaran art (1st Century to 5th
Century CE).
In the Esthetic age of Antiquity the esthetic form has syncretic values, an
esthetic value and an esthetic as well as sacred function (the pyramids, the
temples, the Vedas, etc) In the Ethic age of the Middle Ages the esthetic form
acquires a moral dimension, it has an ethic value as well as a sacred function
(the church, the cathedral, the temple, the mosque). In the Taoist, Buddhist,
Christian, Islamic art the esthetic value makes room for the ethic value at the
centerstage. The ethic value serves a sacred function.The Ethic age changes the
content of medieval art from an esthetic value to an ethic value.
Fig. 2
In figure
2 it is shown the world line of the three values, ESTHETIC, ETHIC, SCIENTIFIC,
the dialectics of their direction, the sense of evolution and the cultural
crises respectively. The world line of the three values is a helix in
spacetime.
The ethic value of the Middle Ages passes from thesis, the spread and
consolidation of the three world religions Buddhist, Christian, Islamic (5th C
to 10th C) to antithesis Averroes (11th C) to synthesis the theory of the
double truth , Siger of Brabant in the 13th C.
The
scientific form of knowledge, the scientific value, the scientific ethos
“… the history of science is, by large, a history of progress.(Science seems to
be the only field of human endeavour of which this can be said)”Karl Popper.
[5]
The scientific form of knowledge together with the esthetic, ethical,
religious, philosophical forms of knowledge create the body of human knowledge,
of human spirit.
And indeed, esthetic, philosophic, religious truths are total, absolute,
perfect, complete, closed.
Scientific truth is partial, relative, imperfect, incomplete with relation to
time and space, open.
Scientific knowledge can be accumulation of new knowledge as well as correction
and integration of previous knowledge.
In other words esthetic, ethic, philosophic, religious values are perennial,
timeless while scientific values are provisional, temporal.
The search for knowledge is a search for truth. From the dawn of humankind man
sought for truth in many ways, magical, esthetic, ethic, religious, mystical,
philosophical, scientific. The scientific form of knowledge is the quest for
scientific truth and it existed as an occupation of the esthetic man of Antiquity.
If we are to credit Karl Popper’s statement “science starts from problems and
not from observations”[6] then we can easily explain the development of
astronomy and mathematics in most ancient cultures. The astronomical knowledge
helped the development of agriculture and navigation while the development of
mathematics contributed to the birth of art and architecture, to the creation
of pyramids, palaces, temples in the Esthetic age of mankind. The scientific
value is present in the Esthetic age and contributes to the consolidation of
the Esthetic form while representing its vehicle. The emancipation of
scientific values from the religious, philosophical, esthetic values takes
place in ancient Greece through the rise of disciplines of thought with an independent
object of study: Thales of Miletus, considered father of science(physics),
Eratosthenes(earth science), Theophrastus (botany),Hippocrates, Dioscorides,
(biology), etc.
In Antiquity and the Middles Ages science as a value does not occupy a
prominent place in any known society of the respective eras as long as the form
of knowledge that creates an ethos is either esthetic or ethic.The esthetic
truth is good enough for Antiquity while the moral truth is good enough for the
Middles Ages.The scientific value has a long way yet of emancipating from the
esthetic and ethical, religious, philosophical values.In the Esthetic age of
Antiquity scientific values still take part in syncretic forms of knowledge,
ex. I Ching, the Vedas.
The Middle Ages will eventually bring a growth in the body of scientific
knowledge ( Islamic Renaissance) but it does not amount to a qualitative change
in the way the scientific value is perceived. The scientific value will not be
central in the system of values of any society prior to the Modern Era. The
Modern Era and namely the Renaissance humanism will mark a beginning of the age
of the scientific ethos. The theory of the double truth(13th c CE) opens up the
field of research for philosophy and science as independent disciplines, philosophy
is no more ancilla theologiae.
It could be argued that from the discovery of the Americas (1492) through the
19th c the moral ethos, namely the Christian ethical ethos never ceased to
raise the moral values of Christianity in a pyramid of values in societies on
three continents, the Americas, Africa, Australia. If this is true then the
content of the moral values of Christianity changed from a medieval goal to a
modern means of cultural education of large masses. The New Testament became a
vehicle of the ultimate truth, the moral truth of Christianity. Evangelization
is a means of shaping the modern man and not an end. I am partially in
agreement with Weber’s thesis[7] that Protestant ethics was instrumental in
developing the capitalist ethos, only that this social ethos is a consequence
of the cultural ethos initiated with the Renaissance and the Age of
Discoveries. The new ethos is the scientific ethos, the (Western) modern man is
the scientific man, the man who wants to know by facts, by the power of reason,
by scientific proof. Early modern age is in the West the age of the scientific
revolution in which ideas and works of scientists like Kepler, Galileo, Isaac
Newton appear in print and are disseminated among students of Universities and
the general public.
”In the seventeenth century as the number of scientists rapidly outgrew the
number of university professorships, scientists increasingly sought to indulge
and share their common interests through memberships in scientific societies,
academies and clubs in lieu of faculty affiliations. By the middle of the
century groups of scientists in various parts of Europe had begun to assemble
privately and conduct experiments.”[8]
The scientific revolution will be followed by the Age of Reason, the 19th and
20th centuries will mark significant developments in the evolution of the
scientific method and scientific ethos. By the 20th century the scientific
ethos became predominant in most known cultures of the globe. The scientific
value is indeed in continuous rise.
For
a theory of human knowledge
Knowledge is multiform, magical, esthetic, ethical, philosophical, mystical,
religious, scientific.Thus Antiquity can be considered the age of symmetrical
thinking, the esthetic age, Middle Age - the age of normative thinking, the
ethical age while Modern Age - the age of exact thinking, the scientific age.
Human knowledge has developed so far four-dimensionally, ART, ETHICS, SCIENCE
on a time coordinate.( Figure 3)
Fig.3
While
artistic and ethic forms developed during 5000 years in rather a monadic
way(Leibnitz), the scientific form( which is a continuum) is relatively a
little developed form, the scientific ethos has a life span of only 500 years.
The age of the scientific ethos is not over yet.
“But is there any danger that our need to progress will go unsatisfied, and
that the growth of scientific knowledge will come to an end? In particular, is
there any danger that the advance of science will come to an end because
science has completed its task? I hardly think so thanks to the infinity of our
ignorance.” Karl Popper[9]
For over 5000 years civilizations and
cultures evolved according to a similar pattern, namely that of closed systems
of values always with a chief value at the top of the pyramid,
Beauty(Antiquity), Goodness(Middle Ages), Truth (modern era) with esthetic
values as chief values for the Ancient world, ethical-religious values as chief
values for the medieval world, and scientific values as chief values for the
modern world.The third millennium of the common era makes possible a shift from
the closed system of values to the open system of values, from the pyramid of
values to the infinite column of values. Artistic knowledge, ethical-religious
knowledge, scientific knowledge can and must harmoniously be developed by
people and for people in an open system, that is with an inexhaustible supply
of energy which is nothing else but the human spirit.
The humanistic message of our era is that of
peaceful coexistence and appreciation of artistic trends, styles, movements,
ethical or religious schools of thought or practice, ways and methods of
scientific research and study as equally valid forms of knowledge.
© Elena Malec, California, May 2006.All rights reserved.
*If you would like to
add a comment to this paper please see my blog Values and Societies.
References
1.Le Goff, Jacques Les Intellectuels au Moyen Age,(Paris: Éditions du
Seuil,1957 )
2. Koyre, Alexandre From the Closed World to the
Infinite Universe (New York: Harper,1958)
3. Childe, V. Gordon "The Urban Revolution" in The Rise and Fall
of Civilizations Modern Archaeological Approaches to Ancient Cultures (
Menlo Park, California: Cummings Publishing Company, 1974 )
4. Liu, Xinru Ancient India and Ancient China trade and religious
exchanges, AD 1-600: Delhi; New York: University Press 1988)
5. Popper, Karl R. The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions, (Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1973 )
6. Popper, Karl R. Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Knowledge (Frankfurt
am Main: Klostermann 1979)
7.Weber, Max The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
8. Dorn, Harold, The Geography of Science (Baltimore and London: The
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991)
9. Popper, Karl R. Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Knowledge